Skip to content
⚡ LIVE From Lizard to Wizard · Wednesday, August 5 · LIMITED SEATS Save my seat →
Episode 1 57 min

Performance at Scale - With Danilo Velasquez

Key Takeaways from our conversation with Danilo Velasquez

Danilo Velasquez

Staff Engineer at Adevinta

In this kickoff episode of Señors @ Scale, host Neciu Dan sits down with Danilo Velasquez — Staff Engineer at Adevinta and longtime frontend performance obsessive.

Main Takeaways from my conversation with Danilo:

Tracking performance manually doesn’t scale. Danilo initially spent 4–5 hours each week gathering Lighthouse scores for dozens of pages. Automating that process with the Lighthouse Node API cut the task to 15 minutes and opened the door to real-time Prometheus integration. The result? A living dashboard that made performance a continuous conversation—not a one-time audit.

💡 Page ownership should align with team ownership. Danilo saw firsthand how abstract “domain boundaries” broke down when multiple teams had partial responsibility for the same pages. His solution: make each team responsible for its own application and page set. When ownership changes, move the code. It’s painful, but clear.

💡 Micro frontends led to micro-messes. In one system, they had 50+ frontend services powering a single feature. It looked modular on paper, but was impossible to maintain. Danilo now recommends grouping apps by team instead of slicing purely by domain—favoring practical boundaries over architectural purity.

💡 Old dependencies are a form of technical debt. Danilo advocates for building as close to the platform as possible—favoring native web components over frameworks when feasible. A five-year-old web component still runs today, but a five-year-old React app might be a minefield of outdated packages.

💡 Platform engineering is a force multiplier. Rather than shipping features directly, Danilo found more leverage in improving CI pipelines, optimizing DX, and standardizing tooling. Helping 10 teams ship better beats building a single product faster. It’s the clearest example of “scaling through others” in engineering.

💡 End-to-end tests are flaky for a reason—and it’s not just the tooling. Danilo points out that many e2e failures reflect real user bugs: delayed renders, missing elements, or race conditions. If your tests fail often, it might be telling you your frontend is too complex, not that Cypress is broken.

💡 Performance regressions should trigger incidents. In Danilo’s org, if a Web Vitals metric turns red, it’s treated like a production outage. That means war rooms, halted deployments, and dedicated fixes. It's a cultural shift: performance isn’t a “nice-to-have”—it’s infrastructure.

💡 Core Web Vitals data needs business context. Most teams track Web Vitals separately from conversion metrics—but that’s a missed opportunity. Danilo recommends wiring performance data into tools like Google Analytics to see if faster LCP actually improves sales, signups, or retention. Without that, you’re optimizing in a vacuum.

💡 Fonts can kill your LCP. One project had 12 separate font files for various weights and styles, all blocking the render. Switching to system fonts massively improved performance with zero user complaints. If users can’t tell the difference—but your metrics can—it’s worth rethinking your stack.

💡 The consent banner might be your LCP—and that’s okay. For EU users, the cookie/consent UI is often the first required interaction. Trying to hide or defer it might break compliance. Instead, Danilo suggests embracing it: load it early, strip down fonts, and make it snappy.

💡 Lighthouse results depend heavily on where and how you run them. Danilo discovered huge swings in scores when Lighthouse ran on shared cloud infrastructure vs. isolated VPS machines. To reduce variability, consider running it on dedicated, stable environments—especially if you’re gating PRs with performance checks.

💡 Long tasks? Try setTimeout(0). If your TTI or FID is struggling, Danilo recommends identifying heavy JS operations and wrapping them in a microtask with setTimeout. It’s a surgical fix—but it can yield major gains by unblocking the main thread faster.

💡 Mentorship isn’t about knowledge transfer—it’s about presence. Danilo believes the best mentors don’t just answer questions—they stick around, ask “why,” and help mentees think for themselves. That kind of leadership builds long-term capability, not short-term productivity.

Episode Length: 57 minutes of pure value

🏆 SOLD OUT IN SINGAPORE · ATHENS · LONDON

From Lizard to Wizard

4-hour remote system design intensive.
Chat apps, microfrontends, BFF, SDUI, event-driven, observability.

€299 4-HOUR INTENSIVE
Save your seat →

Spots are vanishing. Don't be the one who waited.

💡 More Recent Takeaways

Monorepos at Scale with Santosh Yadav
Episode 40

Señors @ Scale host Neciu Dan sits down with Santosh Yadav, principal developer advocate at CodeRabbit and one of only around 80 GitHub Stars in the world. Santosh started hating C in 2004, fell for C# by 2008, and turned a year of open source contributions to Angular and NgRx into a stack of community titles — Google Developer Expert, GitHub Star, Nx champion, and Microsoft MVP. As a staff engineer at Celonis he led the move of 20-plus apps to module federation and drove Nx adoption across 30-plus teams when the product grew from four apps to thirty. From the year-long incremental migration off a single deployable unit, to why polyrepos can't give AI tools the context they need, to how Nx's affected graph and build caching tame a 20-million-line monorepo, to running code review for free for open source at CodeRabbit, this is the monorepo conversation grounded in someone who actually shipped one at scale.

Routing at Scale with Nicolas Beaussart-Hatchuel
Episode 39

Señors @ Scale host Dan Neciu sits down with Nicolas Beaussart-Hatchuel, staff engineer at Payfit and one of the maintainers of TanStack Router. Nicolas's path started with C macros to auto-generate his student paper headers and frontend learned by building phishing login pages for practice, took him through an iframe-based AngularJS-to-Angular 2 micro frontend migration at a web radio platform, into open source contributions across NX, ESLint, Vite and Hasura, and finally to maintaining one of the most ambitious routers in the React ecosystem. From why TanStack Router exists, to migrating Payfit's 300-route, 1.5-million-line codebase off React Router v5 using the strangler pattern, to collapsing 25 polyrepos and five different micro frontend strategies into a single modular monolith, this is the routing conversation most engineers never get.

Redux at Scale with Mark Erikson
Episode 38

Señors @ Scale host Neciu Dan sits down with Mark Erikson, maintainer of Redux and senior front-end engineer at Replay.io, where he works on a time-traveling debugger. Mark's path started with a 286 he got at eight years old, ran through a computer science degree, four years teaching English in China, embedded software at Northrop Grumman emulating legacy CPUs in old aircraft, and a chain of projects — GWT, jQuery, Backbone — that led him to React and Redux. From the @deprecated backlash that had people insulting him on the internet, to why the Redux core hasn't meaningfully changed since 2016, to what RTK Query actually solves, the underused listener middleware, building source maps into React's own build pipeline, and how Replay's recordings now hand debugging over to AI agents — this is the Redux conversation grounded in two decades of shipping software.

TanStack Query at Scale with Dominik Dorfmeister
Episode 37

Señors @ Scale host Dan Neciu sits down with Dominik Dorfmeister — better known as TkDodo — the maintainer of TanStack Query and a software engineer at Sentry. Dominik's path started at a technical high school in Vienna, ran through JVM backend work in Java and Scala, and turned to frontend around the introduction of TypeScript. During the pandemic lockdowns in Austria he started answering questions in the TanStack Discord, got addicted to the instant gratification of helping people, and slowly turned that into a blog, a first code contribution six to eight months later, and eventually maintainership of TanStack Query. From tracked queries and the chaotic version-three-to-four rename, to the version-five mistake he still dreads, to ripping 28,000 lines of dead code out of Sentry with Knip and building Sentry's new design system, this is the open source maintenance conversation most developers never get to hear.

📻 Never Miss New Takeaways

Get notified when new episodes drop. Join our community of senior developers learning from real scaling stories.

💬 Share These Takeaways

Share:

Want More Insights Like This?

Subscribe to Señors @ Scale and never miss conversations with senior engineers sharing their scaling stories.